佰家富app登录|购彩大厅APP | 在线登录-APP下载

来源：佰家富app代理2024-08-19 17:48

佰家富app登录

发力三大领域地方两会聚焦促消费******

　　支持大宗消费，提振服务消费，打造消费增长极……在近期召开的地方两会上，促消费被频频提及。

　　专家表示，消费是稳定经济发展的“压舱石”。当前各地把恢复和扩大消费摆在优先位置，有助于更好释放消费潜力。同时，有利于提振市场信心，发挥消费对经济增长的基础性作用。

　　鼓励大宗商品消费

　　支持新能源汽车、绿色智能家电等大宗消费成为不少地方促消费的重点之一。

　　广东提出，支持住房改善、新能源汽车、绿色智能家电等大宗消费。河南提出，鼓励新能源汽车等大宗商品消费。陕西提出，扩大新能源汽车和绿色智能家电消费。辽宁提出，培育新能源汽车、绿色智能家电、智能穿戴等消费新增长点。

　　“在整个消费结构中，汽车、家电等大宗消费具有消费占比高、产业链长、带动力强的特点，稳定增加汽车、家电等大宗消费对提振消费至关重要。”国务院发展研究中心市场经济研究所研究室副主任、研究员漆云兰表示。

　　为支持大宗消费，多地推出配套措施。天津提出，落实搞活汽车流通、扩大汽车消费14项措施。河南日前发布的《大力提振市场信心促进经济稳定向好政策措施》提出，对在省内新购汽车按购车价格的5%给予消费者补贴，最高不超过10000元/台，省、市级财政各补贴一半；鼓励各地对智能电子产品和家用电器产品消费进行补贴或开展以旧换新促销活动，将省财政对各地实际财政补贴支出按不超过30%给予奖补政策延续至2023年3月底。

　　中国电子信息产业发展研究院消费品工业研究所副研究员陈娟认为，地方政府和企业可积极开展“新能源汽车下乡”、绿色智能“家电下乡”和“以旧换新”活动，加大优惠促销力度，促进大宗产品更新与新增需求的释放。

　　促进服务消费模式创新

　　提振文化旅游、家政服务等服务消费成为一些地方促消费的发力方向。

　　辽宁提出，支持养老服务、教育医疗文化体育服务等消费。广东明确，加大餐饮、文旅、养老、育幼等服务消费促进力度。陕西提出，积极培育运动、康养、托育、家政等消费新热点。山东提出，提质发展餐饮、家政、养老等服务消费。湖北提出，加快提振住宿餐饮、批发零售、文旅体育等消费。

　　“我国服务消费转型升级的新趋势，推动服务市场焕发新的生机与活力，促进服务消费的模式创新与供给的迭代升级成为扩大内需的重要动力。”中国国际经济交流中心副理事长王一鸣表示。

　　国家发改委国民经济综合司司长袁达1月18日表示，推动生活服务消费有序恢复。多渠道增加城乡居民收入，(下转A03版)

中新网评：处理核污水绝不是日本自家私事******

　　中新网北京1月19日电(蒋鲤)日本政府近日称，将于2023年春夏期间开始向海洋排放经过处理的福岛第一核电站核污水。日本罔顾国内民众及周边国家的屡屡反对，企图将核污水“一倒了之”，把一件关乎全球海洋生态环境和公众健康的事当成了自家私事。

资料图：日本福岛第一核电站。

　　2011年，福岛核电站事故发生后，大量放射性物质泄漏到大气层和太平洋，对周围环境造成了难以逆转的伤害，数十万人被迫撤离该地区。时至今日，作为日本邻国之一的韩国仍未解除福岛海鲜禁令。

　　日本以核污水存储能力即将达到上限为由，在2021年4月13日，正式决定将福岛第一核电站核污水排入太平洋。过去一年多，日本政府和东京电力公司一直在持续推进核污水排海计划。

　　日本政府辩称，这些核污水经多核素处理系统(ALPS)处理后很安全，甚至“可以喝”，这样的表态无疑在愚弄大众。

　　事实上，经过处理的核污水仍含有多种放射性物质，核污水一旦排放入海就无法回收，长期来看，将会给海洋生态带来难以估量的潜在威胁，最终危害人类健康。

　　因此，核污水排海计划推出后，遭到日本民众强烈反对。日本《朝日新闻》2022年3月公布的问卷调查显示，福岛县、宫城县和岩手县受访的42个市町村长中，约六成反对东京电力公司福岛第一核电站核污水排放入海。日本全国渔业协会联合会也多次申明立场，反对该计划。

　　日本政府认为，核污水排海是最便宜、最省事的解决方案，但此举却将周边国家乃至全世界置于核污染风险中。太平洋非日本一家之海，核污水会随着洋流流动，其影响势必会跨越国界，危害周边国家乃至整个国际社会的公共福祉和利益。

　　《韩国经济新闻》发文称，相关研究认为，福岛核污水如果排放入海，约7个月后将到达济州等韩国海域，该国水产业和旅游业将遭受相当大的损失。

　　德国南极海洋机构也曾发出警告，若日本将所有核污水排入海中，不到半年，整个太平洋都将面临高度辐射威胁，包括远在大洋另一端的美国。太平洋地区人民更是对日本该计划持反对意见。

　　日本作为《联合国海洋法公约》缔约国，有义务保护海洋环境。然而，在核污水排海方案的正当性、核污水数据的可靠性、净化装置的有效性、环境影响的不确定性等问题上，日本未能作出科学、可信的说明。

　　国际原子能机构技术工作组虽已三次赴日实地考察评估，但尚未就日排海方案的安全性给出结论，并且对日本提出诸多澄清要求和整改意见。在此情况下，日本仍执意推进核污水排海工程建设，这是极不负责任的行为。

　　太平洋不是日本的下水道，日本必须正视各方合理关切，在与周边国家等相关利益方和国际原子能机构充分协商后，制定合理的核污水处理方案。日本也要着眼长远，若只顾眼前，执意将核污水排放入海，不仅其自身，周边国家乃至全世界都将为之买单，其后果必将会危害数代人。

　　Fukushima water disposal by no means Japan’s own business

　　By John Lee

　　(ECNS) -- Japan has announced it will release treated wastewater from the wrecked Fukushima Daiichi Nuclear Power Plant into the Pacific Ocean this year.

　　Although Fukushima wastewater disposal affects global marine ecological environment protection and public health, Japan has turned a deaf ear to domestic and international opposition to dumping the contaminated water into the sea, treating the "global" matter as its own business.

　　The Fukushima accident in 2011 had sent large quantities of radiation into the atmosphere and the Pacific Ocean, causing irreversible damage to the surrounding environment, and hundreds of thousands of people were forced to evacuate the area. South Korea still maintains its import ban on Japanese seafood from areas affected by the Fukushima nuclear disaster.

　　On April 13, 2021, Japan announced it had decided to discharge contaminated radioactive wastewater in Fukushima Prefecture into the sea due to dwindling storage space, with the Japanese government and plant operator Tokyo Electric Power Company Holdings Inc. promoting the release plan over the past year.

　　The Japanese government argues that the water treated by an advanced liquid processing system, or ALPS, is safe and drinkable, which is undoubtedly fooling the public.

　　In fact, the treated wastewater still includes a variety of radioactive substances and can’t be recycled once discharged into the sea, which will pose a great threat to marine ecology and ultimately endanger human health in the long run.

　　Therefore, the discharge plan has been strongly opposed in Japan. According to a questionnaire conducted by The Asahi Shimbun, nearly 60 percent of mayors of 42 municipalities in Iwate, Miyagi and Fukushima prefectures oppose the discharge plan. The National Fisheries Cooperative Federation of Japan has also repeatedly stated its opposition in public.

　　The Japanese government believes that dumping Fukushima wastewater into the sea is the cheapest and most convenient solution, but neighboring countries and even the whole world will be at risk of nuclear pollution.

　　The Pacific Ocean doesn’t belong to Japan and the wastewater flow along oceanic currents will surely break boundaries and endanger public welfare and the interests of neighboring countries and even the international community.

　　The Korea Economic Daily reported that related research concluded that if contaminated water from Fukushima is released into the ocean, it would only take seven months for the contaminated water to reach the shores of Jeju Island, with the country's aquaculture and tourism suffering considerable losses.

　　According to the calculation of a German marine scientific research institute, radioactive materials will spread to most of the Pacific Ocean within half a year from the date of discharge, and the U.S. and Canada will be affected by nuclear pollution. People in the Pacific region also oppose the discharge plan.

　　As a participant of the United Nations Convention on the Law of the Sea, Japan has the obligation of protecting the marine environment.

　　However, it hasn’t offered a full and convincing explanation on issues like the legitimacy of the discharge plan, the reliability of data on the nuclear-contaminated water, the efficacy of the treatment system or the uncertainty of environmental impact.

　　Though the IAEA has yet to complete a comprehensive review after three investigations in Japan, the Japanese side has been pushing through the approval process for its discharge plan and even started building facilities for the discharge. It is rather irresponsible for Japan to act against public opinion at home and concerns abroad.

　　The Pacific Ocean is not a private Japanese sewer. The country must seriously heed the voices of the international community and make a reasonable plan for the Fukushima wastewater disposal after full consultation with stakeholders and international agencies.

　　If it only seeks instant interest and insists on discharging the contaminated water into the sea, not only itself, but also its neighboring countries and the entire world will pay for the decision and several generations will be forced to bear the consequence.